Frothers Unite! UK

RebelWhelp,

Is there any part of the day when you're not blind drunk from cheap as shit weak-ass American "beer"?

Is that possible? My bladder gives out first.

It's possible for a young whelp in his early teens.

Nuclear codes.

OK which is the bigger danger?
a. Trump having access to the codes via "the football" and a command and conrol structure designed to keep a hothead from just nuking someone because it is Thursday

or

b. Negotiating with Iran to get a non-verifiable treaty where they are not precluded from developing the bomb, not precluded from developing ICBMs, not precluded from increasing funding to international terrorism all with the billions illegally transferred to the, who, by the way, have promised to wipe Israel of the map. Not to mention the cash to buy technology from their new BFF, Putin. Hey that "RESTE" button ploy by HRC was a real winner, right folks? Maybe she can do a "RETSE" with Iran!

Hmmmm, tough choice there.

Rebelyell posted:

"globalists" = "jews", for the UK people out there not familiar with the parlance of American conservative nutters.

Typical LW crap. There are plenty of globalists around the world, including the Clintons - HRC who, as ABC news (Yeah, I know Reb, they too are part of the vast right wing conspiracy led by Breitbart)

According to one of the leaked emails, Clinton told Banco Itau in 2013, “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders … I think we have to have a concerted plan to increase trade already under the current circumstances.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clintons-apparent-call-open-borders-trade-draws-scrutiny/story?id=42669657

George Soros, a non-practicing Jew (as opposed to that cabbal of evil Jewish globalists that Reb thinks is being referenced) has spend at least millions and spent years with his open society efforts, (open society = no borders)
https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2015/10/30/george-soros-and-the-open-society-foundations-take-on-the-eus-refugee-crisis/?gclid=CjwKEAjwm_K_BRDx5o-sxq6ouXASJAC7TsFLekQVPeYhYkfIGB77-1xjglJXonQ5PS08I4jT5z0YzRoC6Sfw_wcB

The NY Times (ALSO a part of that dark, evil vast right wing conspiracy led by Breitbart) reported

In a discussion Mr. Clinton moderated on shared prosperity, his four guests were esteemed globalists. The panel included Mauricio Macri, a former businessman who recently defeated Argentina’s entrenched populists to become president; Matteo Renzi, the Italian prime minister who styled his own career on the pro-market progressivism that Mr. Clinton called the “Third Way”; Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, a former Nigerian finance minister and World Bank official; and Sadiq Khan, the first Muslim mayor of London, who was a forceful advocate for Britain’s remaining in the European Union.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/globalism-un-assembly-nationalism-populism.html
Yep. All Jews. Just like Reb said.

Globalists Meet at Bilderberg in Germany to Plot World's Future

http://bilderbergmeetings.org/participants.html

(Yeah, you guessed it. Breitbart is hosting this event as usual as a part of their vast right wing conspiracy)

My JEWS!!!! They are EVERYWHERE! I found three of them in the back of my SUV this morning. One was hiding in a jar of Branston Pickle! BY GOD - THE GLOBALIST JEWS ARE EVERYWHERE THREATENING OUR EXISTENCE WITH GLOBALISM!!!!!!

Right Reb?

So you can draw you own conclusion as to whether the conservatives really believe that, or if it just another LW sterotypical attack by open minded and honest folks like Reb.

Mr Moonshine wrote:Oh I have a few ideas on what would work for all human beings (except the psychopaths).
There's not a chance in the world that I'd share 'em with you guys right now though.

Translation: I have read Ayn Rand.

Mac,

You find those links yet to support that shit you shoveled? Didn't think so...

General Apathy wrote:Anyone else notice the media fixation on what Trump said 11 years ago, yet not a single one has said anything about "yeah, WJC was and is a sleaze, a predator, HRC is an enabler and a harasser of the victims, and laughs when she gets a rapist of an underage girl out of a conviction for rape?

Oh, she laughed? What a crime. It wasn't or about the girl, though, so why the hell do you care?

That's the problem with you sleazy sons-of-bitches: you imply shit that's just not true. Your comments IMPLY that Hillary was laughing at the girl or about her. You know damned well that's not the case. But were someone to call you out on that, you'd just say "Oh, but all I said was she laughed. I didn't say there was any causality".

Well, show feminists that she laughed at the girl, then, Excrement if you want to see some action. Problem is, that never happened, did it?

With regards to Billy C., about the only thing you can say is that Hillary had the bad taste to marry a guy like Trump. That's not exactly a ringing endorsement for Trump for president. Most feminists I know have been angry with Hillary for some time (and let's face it: I know many m ore feminists than you). But they're not likely to cast her as responsible for her husband's acts, especially when the only other option is a guy that's as bad or worse than Bill.

I think the big difference here is this: feminists see Hillary as a seperate person from her husband in moral terms. You seem to think she's Bill's little drone or something.

Anyone else notice the timing of this "surprise" release that has kept and scrutiny or discussion of the contents of the last Wikileaks release?

Which were much, much less than ground-shaking. Get ready for more leaks about Trump, too. They'll be coming thick and fast now. Hey, did you hear he's going to have a hearing in December about him allegedly raping a thirteen year old?

So, I'll take that as a "No I didn't have any links and was just shoveling unsubstantiated shit once again"

As for Trump, I don't care what other sleaze comes out on him. I haven't defended him, excused him, supported him and won't vote for him. If there is bad shit on him, it should come out as well.

HRC - prison or hospital? You never did answer, and no thousands of violations of the espionage act is not a bullshit charge. That's the problem with you sleazy sons-of-bitches: you repeatedly post shit that's just not true.

Mr Moonshine wrote:

cuntshtein wrote:

Mr Moonshine wrote:Oh I have a few ideas on what would work for all human beings (except the psychopaths).

Oh, go on, do tell - you know want to - what does work on you by the way?

the culture of every European nation is being destroyed

Now who would be doing that and how? - come on don't be shy - you're among friends now - just us, nobody else will ever know. Wouldn't you like to tell someone? We can help you.

Er, I've already been quite clear on that. The globalists are doing it, using unfettered mass immigration as a weapon. When a culture is not allowed to defend its borders from unmanaged influx from all other surrounding cultures, it tends to be completely ruined. What is so difficult for you mind-controlled nob-jockeys to understand about that?

What makes it difficult is that you use the word "culture" as if you understood what it means when you most obviously don't.

There is no American culture. The U.S. is a pluralist n ation that contains many cultures, as are Mexico and Canada. And speaking of Mexico's cultures, a good chunk of the U.S. used to be Mexican and those cultures were there before your (probably) broke-ass bohunk ancestors walked out of steerage and onto Ellis Island.

Your problem is this, Moonunit: you don't like Mexicans, but you know it's politically incorrect to say that, so you wuss out and start using weasel words like "culture" in order to hide your xenophobia and probable racism.

You and me are both Americans. I assure you, our cultures are very, very different. Thankfully, yours si not able to reproduce itself much, anymore, which is why you've resorted to rabble-rousing among the alt-right set. Frankly, most Mexican immigrants I have met are a hell of a lot more "my culture" than the skinheads and broke-ass cowboy wanna-bes that you are pleased to call your people.

General Apathy wrote:Mac,

You find those links yet to support that shit you shoveled? Didn't think so...

You find those links showing how most scientists think global warming either doesn't exist or is not man made?

Didn't think so.