Moderator: FU!UK Committee
Guest wrote:So where's the collusion?
You seem fixated on unrelated crimes that the DOJ could have and should have handled without the need for a special counsel.
And you keep ignoring the lack of evidence of collusion. Even Woodward who looked very hard for it could find no trace. If there had been, it would have leaked by now at a minimum, or some underlings would have been charged so they could be flipped to get to the big fish.
All you can do is act the fool and mock sources you dislike, despite the same information coming from sources you've used or accepted.
So where's the collusion?
Guest wrote:So Rebelyell AKA dumbfuck #1 can't identify ANY instances of "Russian collusion" by the administration, can't explain why sites like Politico and the self identified progressive news site The Nation also say what he was mocking ('cause it was from a RW source he didn't like therefore it was bullshit).
Caldera Cal (AKA Dumbfuck #3) Call it whatever you want, Muller has nothing, or he would have run with it by now instead of the old non-related prosecutions. I'm using the terms being used in the LW sources your kind values so highly. And if Bloomberg is on such solid ground, don't they have a civic duty to tell Muller how to do his job? They are OBVIOUSLY more qualified in that regard.
Why don't you advise Mueller, smart mouth?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests