Re: State of the Union - pre/post election & whatever...
Mac is the one who claims there's 8 places in the Bible that prohibit me from having sex with an African American. Not me. Yet, when called on it he can't cite a single chapter and verse.
Mac CLAIMS to be an academic, yet he can't even back up his claims like any good professor should. Now, if he wants to come right out and admit that he does not need to submit his ranting here, excuse me, his writing here, to the same economic discipline as in a paper on incidences of bestiality among sex workers in São Paulo, well then he is giving us permission to call BULLSHIT. As a peer reviewing your paper for publication might ask, "Where did you come up with that number? Oh. It was in JAMA! Why didn't you say so?"
Don't try to deflect this with your usual "Oh, I suppose this means that you want to turn fire hoses on Holocaust survivors if they don't like your fascist friends?????" bullshit. You're real good at that too. Do you get away with that in academia?
"Look it up yourself on the Internet!" Another classic Mac move. You can't find proof for your dumb ass claims yourself, so you challenge me to do it for you.
I ask you again. Show me at least 8 places in the Bible where it prohibits me from having sex with African American women.
In the Song of Solomon, the woman says "I am very dark yet beautiful, o daughters of Jerusalem."
Song of Solomon, chapter 1, verse 5. See? It's easy. Oh poo. I found a whole BOOK that says it's ok for the King to take an Aethiopian concubine. Not only that, it's glorious and wonderful that he does.
You claimed 8. Find your 8. Don't challenge me to prove racist views I do not possess. ("When did you stop beating your wife?"). But you can't, because you are a fraud. And so are your sycophants and acolytes.
And Moabites don't count.
As I said above, they're just filthy heathens and not racially distinct.
As for his "anonymous" *cough cough* Guest followers, Mac is the one claiming Biblical authority, not me.
Mac CLAIMS to be an academic, yet he can't even back up his claims like any good professor should. Now, if he wants to come right out and admit that he does not need to submit his ranting here, excuse me, his writing here, to the same economic discipline as in a paper on incidences of bestiality among sex workers in São Paulo, well then he is giving us permission to call BULLSHIT. As a peer reviewing your paper for publication might ask, "Where did you come up with that number? Oh. It was in JAMA! Why didn't you say so?"
Don't try to deflect this with your usual "Oh, I suppose this means that you want to turn fire hoses on Holocaust survivors if they don't like your fascist friends?????" bullshit. You're real good at that too. Do you get away with that in academia?
"Look it up yourself on the Internet!" Another classic Mac move. You can't find proof for your dumb ass claims yourself, so you challenge me to do it for you.
I ask you again. Show me at least 8 places in the Bible where it prohibits me from having sex with African American women.
In the Song of Solomon, the woman says "I am very dark yet beautiful, o daughters of Jerusalem."
Song of Solomon, chapter 1, verse 5. See? It's easy. Oh poo. I found a whole BOOK that says it's ok for the King to take an Aethiopian concubine. Not only that, it's glorious and wonderful that he does.
You claimed 8. Find your 8. Don't challenge me to prove racist views I do not possess. ("When did you stop beating your wife?"). But you can't, because you are a fraud. And so are your sycophants and acolytes.
And Moabites don't count.
As for his "anonymous" *cough cough* Guest followers, Mac is the one claiming Biblical authority, not me.