State of the Union - pre/post election & whatever...

[Drjackson]

GA writing these posts too?

He does have a history of creating alts to argue with himself. Let him get on with it. They say you're never alone when you're batshit.

I suspected as much

[General Apathy]

He does have a history of creating alts to argue with himself. Let him get on with it.

History long past. Was caught at it. many here expected me to run and hide. Instead I owned up to it and post with my identifiable log in only.

I post more than enough annoying (to you) stuff that you folks can whine about. I have dozens of threads I never post just so I don't become more tedious than I already am. Not about to waste posting that annoying broken record when I can post about so many other actual things.

They say you're never alone when you're batshit.

I suspect the "they" he refers to are the voices in his head and explains why he's never alone.

[Guest]

Again, remember - don't respond to the twat. Ignore him.
He'll come out with stuff purposefully to provoke you. Be strong and just ignore him.
That's the only way you'll get to him. He thrives on attention, so don't give him any. It winds him up something rotten.
No matter what he says (he's just doing it to make you say something), just ignore him.
It really aggravates him. He gets more desperate and starts getting abusive. You can tell it's working.
Ignore him.

[Law-N-Order]

Should of complied, bitch

https://youtu.be/ihQ1-LQOkns

[Law-N-Order]

Should of complied, bitch

https://youtu.be/ihQ1-LQOkns

[General Apathy]

Yes, antifa is the moral equivalent of neo-Nazis

Last weekend in Berkeley, Calif., a group of neo-communist antifa — “anti-fascist” — thugs attacked peaceful protesters at a “No to Marxism in America” rally, wielding sticks and pepper spray, and beating people with homemade shields that read (I kid you not) “No Hate.” The Post reports how one peaceful protester “was attacked by five black-clad antifa members, each windmilling kicks and punches into a man desperately trying to protect himself.” Members of the Berkeley College Republicans were then stalked by antifa goons who followed them to a gas station and demanded they “get the [expletive] out” of their car, warning, “We are real hungry for supremacists and there is more of us.”

The organizer of the anti-Marxism protest is not a white supremacist. Amber Cummings is a self-described “transsexual female who embraces diversity” and had announced on Facebook that “any racist groups like the KKK [and] Neo Nazis . . . are not welcome.” The protest was needed, Cummings said, because “Berkeley is a ground zero for the Marxist Movement.”

As if to prove Cummings’s point, the antifa movement responded with jackboots and clubs — because their definition of “fascist” includes not just neo-Nazis but also anyone who opposes their totalitarian worldview.

And let’s be clear: Totalitarian is precisely what they are. Mark Bray, a Dartmouth lecturer who has defended antifa’s violent tactics, recently explained in The Post, “Its adherents are predominantly communists, socialists and anarchists” who believe that physical violence “is both ethically justifiable and strategically effective.” In other words, they are no different from neo-Nazis. Neo-Nazis are the violent advocates of a murderous ideology that killed 25 million people last century. Antifa members are the violent advocates of a murderous ideology that, according to “The Black Book of Communism,” killed between 85 million and 100 million people last century. Both practice violence and preach hate. They are morally indistinguishable. There is no difference between those who beat innocent people in the name of the ideology that gave us Hitler and Himmler and those who beat innocent people in the name of the ideology that gave us Stalin and Dzerzhinsky.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/yes-antifa-is-the-moral-equivalent-of-neo-nazis/2017/08/30/9a13b2f6-8d00-11e7-91d5-ab4e4bb76a3a_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.80bc75d683ef

More at the link.

[General Apathy]

Should have complied?!?

Nope. She is required by law in addition to hospital protocol to do what she did. Had she given the blood sample, she and the hospital would likely been sued and the "evidence", improperly and illegally obtained, would have never gotten into a courtroom.

HIPAA Privacy Rule

http://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/definition/HIPAA

[Winnie]

Again, remember - don't respond to the twat. Ignore him.
He'll come out with stuff purposefully to provoke you. Be strong and just ignore him.
That's the only way you'll get to him. He thrives on attention, so don't give him any. It winds him up something rotten.
No matter what he says (he's just doing it to make you say something), just ignore him.
It really aggravates him. He gets more desperate and starts getting abusive. You can tell it's working.
Ignore him.

"Shut up", he explained.

[Winnie]

Again, remember - don't respond to the twat. Ignore him.
He'll come out with stuff purposefully to provoke you. Be strong and just ignore him.
That's the only way you'll get to him. He thrives on attention, so don't give him any. It winds him up something rotten.
No matter what he says (he's just doing it to make you say something), just ignore him.
It really aggravates him. He gets more desperate and starts getting abusive. You can tell it's working.
Ignore him.

"Shut up", he explained.

[Voice From Limbo]

Well,now,I'm pretty dull, but I have a sneaking suspicion there was some irony involved in that there comment.