Frothers Unite! UK

Or not...

The assumption that most college campuses lean left is so widespread in American culture that it has almost become a caricature: intellectuals in thick-rimmed glasses preaching Marxism on idyllic grassy quads; students protesting minor infractions against political correctness; raging professors trying to prove that God is, in fact, dead. Studies about professors’ political beliefs and voting behavior suggest this assumption is at least somewhat correct. But Shields and Dunn set out to investigate a more nuanced question: For the minority of professors who are cultural and political conservatives, what’s life actually like?

Finding out wasn’t easy, in part because so many conservative professors are—as they put it—closeted. Some of the people they interviewed explicitly said they identify with the experience of gays and lesbians in having to hide who they are. One tenure-track sociology professor even asked to meet Shields and Dunn in a park a mile away from his university. “When the sound of footsteps intruded on our sanctuary, he stopped talking altogether, his eyes darting about,” they write. “Given the drama of this encounter, one might think that he is concealing something scandalous. In truth, this professor is hiding the fact that he is a Republican.”

As far-flung as these incidents were, they have something crucial in common. Like the organizations that opposed the Multnomah County Republican Party’s participation in the 82nd Avenue of Roses Parade, these activists appear to be linked to a movement called “antifa,” which is short for antifascist or Anti-Fascist Action. The movement’s secrecy makes definitively cataloging its activities difficult, but this much is certain: Antifa’s power is growing. And how the rest of the activist left responds will help define its moral character in the Trump age.

The Shade of William F Buckley wrote:Ever wonder why Altius has not "answered your question"? - Because you are a cunt who offended him.

In 1867, the New Orleans Times asked several leading citizens to comment on the newly passed Reconstruction Acts. Unwisely, Longstreet suggested that Southerners support the Republicans. He was praised in the North, but vilified in the South. In June 1868, he received his pardon – by act of Congress – with help from General Grant. He supported Grant for president, and when elected, Grant nominated Longstreet to be the Surveyor of Customs for the Port of New Orleans. For this last betrayal of the South he was labeled a “scalawag.”

Many of Longstreet’s actions after the war were controversial: his letters to the New Orleans Times, his support of the Republican Party, his acceptance of political appointments, and the fact that he commanded African-Americans (part of the New Orleans Metropolitan Police Force). Worst of all, he had dared to criticize Robert E. Lee’s leadership. Very quickly he became the target of “Lost Cause” attacks by Jubal Early, William Pendleton, Rev. J William Jones, and others. Longstreet spent the rest of his life attempting to restore his reputation.

... had no idea that he was asking any questions. But I have no doubt it was something offensive.

...we've been talking about the hate rally and I know he's taking the contrary position.

General Apathy wrote:

The assumption that most college campuses lean left is so widespread in American culture that it has almost become a caricature: intellectuals in thick-rimmed glasses preaching Marxism on idyllic grassy quads; students protesting minor infractions against political correctness; raging professors trying to prove that God is, in fact, dead. Studies about professors’ political beliefs and voting behavior suggest this assumption is at least somewhat correct. But Shields and Dunn set out to investigate a more nuanced question: For the minority of professors who are cultural and political conservatives, what’s life actually like?

Finding out wasn’t easy, in part because so many conservative professors are—as they put it—closeted. Some of the people they interviewed explicitly said they identify with the experience of gays and lesbians in having to hide who they are. One tenure-track sociology professor even asked to meet Shields and Dunn in a park a mile away from his university. “When the sound of footsteps intruded on our sanctuary, he stopped talking altogether, his eyes darting about,” they write. “Given the drama of this encounter, one might think that he is concealing something scandalous. In truth, this professor is hiding the fact that he is a Republican.”

Yep. Grampa Apathy is a lying hypocrite.

If I want a different viewpoint, I will talk to the OFM because he is still a reasonable person.

Hard to support the Town Moron's claim if you look at what I actually posted. Maybe you can help? How exactly do the following support his claim?

(I'll save this and copy / paste for all the similar brainless posts that will appear to follow)
I've posted that:
1. The counter protesters had every right to be there
2. There were a few troublemakers on the left (ANTIFA) who camped armed and looking to have conflict
3. The authorities were unprepared for the event in terms of both planning and execution
4. The local and VA State Police failed to protect the citizens from the violent alt right criminals
5. The alt right criminals are domestic terrorists who should be pursued with the full force of the federal government
6. The alt right criminals should be pursued with the full force of the federal government for federal civil rights violations
7. The people who were attacked by the alt right are certainly within their right to defend themselves and others as they try to withdraw from an out of control situation.
8. The alt right trespassers on the UVA green should have been removed by the police, arresting those who would not comply.

So you tell me...what in that supports the Town Moron's claims? I haven't attacked the peaceful counter protesters, just limited my criticism of those opposing the alt right who came armed looking for a fight.

Yet lying loons like Rebby the Town Moron keep making brainless comments like I quoted and the hive mind drools and cheers him on.

The violent clash in Charlottesville last weekend began with a protest against the city council's decision to remove a statue memorializing Confederate General Robert E. Lee.

Since then, other statues honoring the Confederacy and Confederate icons have been toppled by force or removed by city officials. Eight major cities across the United States are also reportedly considering removing Confederate symbols in their communities, according to CNN.

One group is bringing a similar debate to Boston, asking to rename city landmark Faneuil Hall.

Kevin Peterson, member of political group "The New Democracy Coalition," told reporters on Wednesday that the marketplace named for Peter Faneuil is "an embarrassment" to Boston, reports WCVB.

According to Peterson, Faneuil's role as a slave-owner and slave trader is reason to remove his name from the popular tourist marketplace and historic meeting place. Faneuil was born in 1700 and died in Boston in 1743.

WCVB reporter David Bienick said Mayor Marty Walsh did not outright reject the idea when asked.

At least 12 U.S. presidents have owned slaves throughout the country's history, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Union Commanding General Ulysses S. Grant, prior to the Civil War.

In Massachusetts, there is one Confederate memorial. Fort Warren on Georges Island in Boston Harbor was erected in 1963, as Civil Rights federal legislation was being introduced. The memorial remembers 13 Confederate prisoners who died in captivity.

According to a 2016 report by the Southern Poverty Law Center, there are 1,500 Confederate symbols across the country, including 718 monuments. At least 109 public schools are named for General Robert E. Lee, and 80 counties and cities are named after Confederate icons.