Frothers Unite! UK

BadBabyBunny wrote:

Monkeyborg wrote:

BadBabyBunny wrote:…despite its topic it's not as full of bunch of cunts waggling their tiny stump cocks at one another…

I beg to differ.

You would be wrong.. Again.. The football thread is astonishingly polite by frothers standards. This thread became a cesspit and had exhausted its substantive points after the first 100 posts.

When you stoop to writing purile infantile haikus about people you don't like you have become indistinguishable from the people you are complaining about. End of the day Bill / tango, legion et al would feel very much at home on this thread and very out of place on the rest of the site.

Continuing it.. And letting it become so childish and unpleasant... Has completely undermined any valid points regarding bills practices. That is an incredible achievement. Congratulations.

No, YOU would be wrong. Folk here are very distinguishable from those cunts on TMP but then you knew that. And it undermines nothing about Bills practices, it's simply an outlet for those who want to talk trash about TMP. You seem obsessed by that, I wonder why?

I haven't read TMP in ages. I know they're mostly twats so I avoid it. Don't understand why you think you need to preach to folk, but you look like an ass.

Childish? Unpleasant? In many places yes. But also free from what makes TMP horrible. So, y'know, swings and roundabouts.

And it's puerile, not purile. If you're going to speak down to people at least larn two speel propa.

Duff wrote:Pest is quite correct I'm afraid Mac. If he was claiming that your argument was wrong because of your academic status then you would be right, but all he is in fact doing is saying with that particular post is that your style of posting is long winded and lacking content, which is a fairly common trait of much academic writing (or at least the common perception of it), so it's fair usage of the term. Plus you do tend to waffle on a lot Mac.

Unless you mean ad hominem to simply mean an attack or insult as opposed to a fallacious argument of course, in which case you're on the wrong forum.

Oh, I agree I blather on here.

The "ad hominem" part comes in when he claims that this is because of academia. That is the entirety of his claim. And why is this? Because he's read my academic work or knows anything at all about my career or my field? No: because of "academia" and "soft-science". The ad hominem here is directed against the field: it is bad because it is bad, because of -- as you point out -- commonly imagined traits about it, not because of any proof regarding it or my academic writing.

It's like saying "You act the way you do because you're a Jew and Jews are all ursurious shysters." The misreperesentation of Jews as a stereotype stands in for any argument based on logic regarding the person's behavior. The ad hominem stands, though: it is attacking someone based on what they supposedly are, not on the content of their actions or ideas.

Without having read a single academic article of mine, Pestie claims that they are useless and long-winded because of, well, the character of academia and what he amusingly refers to as "soft sciences".

http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=374711

He's masturbating furiously as he clicks on the map.

BadBabyBunny wrote:You would be wrong.. Again.. The football thread is astonishingly polite by frothers standards. This thread became a cesspit and had exhausted its substantive points after the first 100 posts.

When you stoop to writing purile infantile haikus about people you don't like you have become indistinguishable from the people you are complaining about. End of the day Bill / tango, legion et al would feel very much at home on this thread and very out of place on the rest of the site.

Continuing it.. And letting it become so childish and unpleasant... Has completely undermined any valid points regarding bills practices. That is an incredible achievement. Congratulations.

Thank you, Miss Manners.

You've given us the weekly Sermon from the Mount.

Now please piss off.

Passer by wrote:http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=374711

He's masturbating furiously as he clicks on the map.

http://web.archive.org/web/201502121938 ... ?id=374711

It was worth it...

Passer by wrote:http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=374711

He's masturbating furiously as he clicks on the map.

Metal Guru's entered into the spirit of things

In other news: I see Tango's off the secure ward...

Nuking York never felt so good.

sherbet wrote:

BadBabyBunny wrote:

Monkeyborg wrote:

BadBabyBunny wrote:…despite its topic it's not as full of bunch of cunts waggling their tiny stump cocks at one another…

I beg to differ.

You would be wrong.. Again.. The football thread is astonishingly polite by frothers standards. This thread became a cesspit and had exhausted its substantive points after the first 100 posts.

When you stoop to writing purile infantile haikus about people you don't like you have become indistinguishable from the people you are complaining about. End of the day Bill / tango, legion et al would feel very much at home on this thread and very out of place on the rest of the site.

Continuing it.. And letting it become so childish and unpleasant... Has completely undermined any valid points regarding bills practices. That is an incredible achievement. Congratulations.

No, YOU would be wrong. Folk here are very distinguishable from those cunts on TMP but then you knew that. And it undermines nothing about Bills practices, it's simply an outlet for those who want to talk trash about TMP. You seem obsessed by that, I wonder why?

I haven't read TMP in ages. I know they're mostly twats so I avoid it. Don't understand why you think you need to preach to folk, but you look like an ass.

Childish? Unpleasant? In many places yes. But also free from what makes TMP horrible. So, y'know, swings and roundabouts.

And it's puerile, not purile. If you're going to speak down to people at least larn two speel propa.

Wow.. Incorrect about everything but spelling old chap. Given the choice I will continue to spell incorrectly and not be a twat.

It's a shame bill won't have you lot back... his site loses something by not having you.. And this one loses something by having you here.

BadBabyBunny wrote:It's a shame bill won't have you lot back... his site loses something by not having you.. And this one loses something by having you here.

As you like to say with such certainty - incorrect. Personally, I was already a member here before Bill canned my account(s). As were many others. So, wrong again.

If you don't like it, don't read it. I don't read half the shit on this forum for that very reason. But, by all means, keep making yourself look like a twat by whinging about this thread.

Keeps it going you see.

Lots of people were members here... And lots of them were cunts.... But mostly in a friendly way. You will note that I didn't say you weren't... But at heart...

You are just an unpleasant TMP fuckwit.

And here endeth the lesson... When a pack of arrogant small minded bullies posts thousands of pages of vitriol you can show them for what they are by simply pointing it out and watching their collective bullet heads swing towards you. There is no thought here.. Nothing interesting.. Just losers who have nothing better to do than vent bollocks because they got banned from a rather shit website.

Very sad people... Very sad