Frothers Unite! UK

frotherPest wrote:Mimimi, mimimimi.
Mimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimi, mimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimi.
Mimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimi.

I find it touching that what I write moves you so much that you're trying to start a flame war, Pestie. I'm honored.

Macunaima wrote:

Beaker is soooo pleasuring himself in that gif. Mmmmm… Beakerwank…

kawasaki wrote:Can I piss and moan about the, frankly, IMO, fucking pointless football thread?

Or should I just not bother clicking and reading it?

The football thread may not be of interest to you.. But despite its topic it's not as full of bunch of cunts waggling their tiny stump cocks at one another as this one.

Macunaima wrote:

frotherPest wrote:

Typical of idiots, you use "academic" as an ad hominem.

An ad hominem attack would have meant I was addressing the content of your post rather than your predilection for unnecessary length.
Nor did I use "academic" as an attack, I used your career in the soft sciences as a means to attack your posting habits.

For someone who writes so much, you have a difficult time with reading comprehension.

You know sweet fuck-all about my career, my publications and anthropology. So yes, sweetums, it is indeed an ad hominem attack. Did your momma teach you how to do that?

Pest is quite correct I'm afraid Mac. If he was claiming that your argument was wrong because of your academic status then you would be right, but all he is in fact doing is saying with that particular post is that your style of posting is long winded and lacking content, which is a fairly common trait of much academic writing (or at least the common perception of it), so it's fair usage of the term. Plus you do tend to waffle on a lot Mac.

Unless you mean ad hominem to simply mean an attack or insult as opposed to a fallacious argument of course, in which case you're on the wrong forum.

BadBabyBunny wrote:

kawasaki wrote:Can I piss and moan about the, frankly, IMO, fucking pointless football thread?

Or should I just not bother clicking and reading it?

The football thread may not be of interest to you.. But despite its topic it's not as full of bunch of cunts waggling their tiny stump cocks at one another as this one.

You don't post in the football thread then?

BadBabyBunny wrote:

kawasaki wrote:Can I piss and moan about the, frankly, IMO, fucking pointless football thread?

Or should I just not bother clicking and reading it?

The football thread may not be of interest to you.. But despite its topic it's not as full of bunch of cunts waggling their tiny stump cocks at one another as this one.

Just answer the fucking question you cunt. <that's an ad hominem.

BadBabyBunny wrote:…despite its topic it's not as full of bunch of cunts waggling their tiny stump cocks at one another…

I beg to differ.

Monkeyborg wrote:

BadBabyBunny wrote:…despite its topic it's not as full of bunch of cunts waggling their tiny stump cocks at one another…

I beg to differ.

You would be wrong.. Again.. The football thread is astonishingly polite by frothers standards. This thread became a cesspit and had exhausted its substantive points after the first 100 posts.

When you stoop to writing purile infantile haikus about people you don't like you have become indistinguishable from the people you are complaining about. End of the day Bill / tango, legion et al would feel very much at home on this thread and very out of place on the rest of the site.

Continuing it.. And letting it become so childish and unpleasant... Has completely undermined any valid points regarding bills practices. That is an incredible achievement. Congratulations.

Sorry, could you repeat that? I couldn't hear over the sound of you menstruating.

BadBabyBunny wrote:

Monkeyborg wrote:

BadBabyBunny wrote:…despite its topic it's not as full of bunch of cunts waggling their tiny stump cocks at one another…

I beg to differ.

You would be wrong.. Again.. The football thread is astonishingly polite by frothers standards. This thread became a cesspit and had exhausted its substantive points after the first 100 posts.

When you stoop to writing purile infantile haikus about people you don't like you have become indistinguishable from the people you are complaining about. End of the day Bill / tango, legion et al would feel very much at home on this thread and very out of place on the rest of the site.

Continuing it.. And letting it become so childish and unpleasant... Has completely undermined any valid points regarding bills practices. That is an incredible achievement. Congratulations.

So? What do you think you are achieving here other than to help us reach the next stretch goal? Do you honestly think if this thread vanished Frothers would somehow become filled with enlightening topics about miniatures or that we would all become obsessed with football and talk endless drivel about that instead? Just how do you think not having this thread would change Frothers in any way others that to decrease what little traffic there is here even more?
Your theory that Frothers has so completely undermined any valid points regarding Bill is fascinating and completely explains the widely held views outside of TMP that Bill is not a complete cunt and why The Wargames Website failed so hopeless to get any members and soon folded after it's creation. It probably also explains why when you Google Bill Armintrout you don't get any other websites and blogs mentioning what a state TMP is in now