sherbet wrote:frotherPest wrote:Nah.
I'm interested in reading when someone has something worth writing.
Typical of someone who has made a life out of soft science academia, you like to use many words to express very little in terms of ideas. I understand that it has become an essential part of your career to produce content, even if it has little value, because a professor's cv needs to be filled with publications even if they are really crap.
But here, nobody is going to base their judgement on the content of your posts in terms of word count.
You seem pretty sure of your own academic superiority there...
For the record I'd agree Mac can get a bit too verbose by half. But then Bill's touched a nerve with him, as he did with me, so I see how it's possible to over work it.
Anyway, when you have something worth reading - as opposed to some cheap insults - I look forward to it.
I'm just happy I inspire Pestie to write more than his usual 144 character tweets. I should probably charge for the lessons.
