Frothers Unite! UK

frotherPest wrote:Damn, Macunaima. You really like to read your own words, don't you?

That was a quick response. Must've stung you like a bee.

Keep it up, Mac, you're pissing off the bastards and that's a good thing.

Altius wrote:

frotherPest wrote:Damn, Macunaima. You really like to read your own words, don't you?

That was a quick response. Must've stung you like a bee.

Keep it up, Mac, you're pissing off the bastards and that's a good thing.

They'll learn not to complain one day, it only makes the thread longer

Each little grumble is still a contribution.

Ever onwards to 2000 pages!

Mum would have been so proud.

kawasaki wrote:Mum would have been so proud.

We'll let you plant some flowers for her on page 2000... or 2001 if Mac gets there first.

With Bill helping, it'll be a snap

frotherPest wrote:Damn, Macunaima. You really like to read your own words, don't you?

Not as much as you like reading them, apparently.

Not as much as you like reading them, apparently.

Nah.
I'm interested in reading when someone has something worth writing.
Typical of someone who has made a life out of soft science academia, you like to use many words to express very little in terms of ideas. I understand that it has become an essential part of your career to produce content, even if it has little value, because a professor's cv needs to be filled with publications even if they are really crap.
But here, nobody is going to base their judgement on the content of your posts in terms of word count.

UrbanWulf wrote:"Use a scatter die to determine the path of the severed head". I really hope nobody writes rules for gaming anything like this.

Pfft. GW did that in WFRP thirty years ago.