kawasaki wrote:I'll put a monkey on "never" at 1000-1…
I'm just used and abused.
Used and abused.
Moderator: FU!UK Committee
kawasaki wrote:I'll put a monkey on "never" at 1000-1…
Monkeyborg wrote:kawasaki wrote:I'll put a monkey on "never" at 1000-1…
I'm just used and abused.
Used and abused.
TMP - killing off small companies!Editor in Chief Bill wrote:It also 'thins the herd' so to speak, so that marginal and under-financed companies fall off the radar, leaving the better managed companies to dominate the news sphere.
General Paranoia wrote:What are you doing back here, I thought we'd sold you into prostitution?
Sane Max wrote:I assume you are all taking the piss, rather than being a bit thick?
Monkeyborg wrote:General Paranoia wrote:What are you doing back here, I thought we'd sold you into prostitution?
You did.
I don't know quite what happened, but I've ended up out of pocket!
I did manage to get a few chickens though…
TMP - killing off small companies!Editor in Chief Bill wrote:It also 'thins the herd' so to speak, so that marginal and under-financed companies fall off the radar, leaving the better managed companies to dominate the news sphere.

Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian 08 Feb 2015 1:53 p.m. PSTFirst email addresses and now passwords.
This is not good.
What is going on?
Not reallt sure what you're on about.
Yes, we've used a relatively low-security method for advertisers to access a particular report. We felt the level of security was appropriate for the information involved.
Yes, if an advertiser is not careful, he might leak the URL containing his account password. With hundreds of advertisers over the years, this has apparently happened just twice.
Can someone do anything malicious if he gets the password? No.


Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 34 guests