General Paranoia wrote:
Well if only you broadened your sphere of operations from the shed, you could have been in Bill's inner circle long ago!
I thought his sphere was well and truly broadened by now. Slack is the term often used.
Moderator: FU!UK Committee
General Paranoia wrote:
Well if only you broadened your sphere of operations from the shed, you could have been in Bill's inner circle long ago!
Monkeyborg wrote:Frothers are sad that Stedders's arse is like a tattered shammy leather and no longer has any purchase. If you don't buy a FU-UK Supporting Membership then you must be a foreign and Godless traitor. Send more money.
flip wrote:I love how no one, no one, apparently on TMP has any clue how adsense works or how advertising and data collection work on the internet.
No different than any other third-party ad distributor. In order to be competitive, most don't really screen incoming advertisers. It is easier/cheaper to take money, wait for complaints, then kick them out with no refund.
TMP - killing off small companies!Editor in Chief Bill wrote:It also 'thins the herd' so to speak, so that marginal and under-financed companies fall off the radar, leaving the better managed companies to dominate the news sphere.
Derek H wrote:flip wrote:I love how no one, no one, apparently on TMP has any clue how adsense works or how advertising and data collection work on the internet.
Apparently it's your duty as a good TMPer to click on an advert at least once per visit. (or at least it's "good etiquette") http://web.archive.org/web/20150116122813/http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=371936
Installing AdBlock Plus is no doubt treasonous.
General Paranoia wrote:Someone has accidentally stumbled upon Chicken Bill's modus operandiNo different than any other third-party ad distributor. In order to be competitive, most don't really screen incoming advertisers. It is easier/cheaper to take money, wait for complaints, then kick them out with no refund.
http://web.archive.org/web/201501161248 ... ?id=371929
TMP - killing off small companies!Editor in Chief Bill wrote:It also 'thins the herd' so to speak, so that marginal and under-financed companies fall off the radar, leaving the better managed companies to dominate the news sphere.
Steders wrote:Fuck
Just think what sort of ads would turn up on here if the committee decided they needed extra cash for their various addictions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests