Page 24 of 103

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 3:31 am
by aliensurfer
Bumblebee wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No.
The blame rests with people who turn a blind eye to reality or turn the blame around onto someone else and give a pass to certain parts of American culture because of race.
People like you.
When it's black gun violence, it's overlooked.
When it's white gun violence, it's a world-wide terror event.


I'm not racist but..."

No. That's not what I'm saying.
Though it easier to cop out and go the racist route and assume racism on someone else's part because of their assumed race, especially when you are not the racist.


"I'm not racist but..."


but what Bumblebee, spit it out man (cue Steders) :wink:

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:14 am
by Guest
I'm not racist but some of my best friends are white despite the fact that whites are a defective, arrogant, and eager to be emotionally manipulated race.
As a race, whites are tolerable at best.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:16 am
by fear_the_squirrels
Duff wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No. That's not what I'm saying.


It seems pretty clear that that is exactly what you are saying. Maybe you could open our eyes and actually state what the point of your post is?


Its a valid point put forth in a shitty way. The few lone psychos who kill 10+ get huge attention, but the vast majority of gun violence is one/two murders, drive-bys etc... Which get little media attention (Poor killing poor). This is usually viewed as an urban problem, but it extends to other poor white areas also (AKA 'hill billy country'). Though to a lesser extent as there is less fighting over territory, more crimes of passion. Its too simplified to boil it down to white vs black.

They represent different problems in my mind with different solutions. Better background checks won't solve violence driven by being poor (Education and real opportunity will), and its unclear if it would assist in solving access for lone psychos as they don't present till too late.

-TOC

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:02 am
by aecurtis
nate the great wrote:I was going to stay out of this bullshit but after talking to my kids yesterday and dealing with a very upset 7 year old last night I can't.

I live in central Pennsylvania. I own a rifle for hunting deer. On the first day of rifle deer hunting season in Pennsylvania there are more armed people out and about than in the US armed forces. ( i know this was true in 2000, it may not apply today) I did not grow up with guns. I grew up in the UK. The first 5 years in Brechin Scotland, the next 14 years in Harrogate N. Yorkshire. I ended up in Pa and learned to hunt with a coworker. I enjoy it and have shot deer and black bear in northern pa for the last 17 years.

Tomorrow if they banned guns and I even had to hand over my rifle I would. I don't believe any of this militia crap! My family spent the weekend with friends who all have elementary aged kids. and we actually argued/ discussed this a lot. The gut that argued the most about right to bear arms and militia's doesn't actually own any weapons. So go figure!
We did actually all agree on 4 things:
1. The argument of if everyone is armed we could have stopped things like Friday happening is completely fucking stupid.
2. American society is obsessed with violence and guns. Just look at the movies, tv shows, video games. No i don't wanna ban BF3 but seriously does little Johnny age 8 need to play it 8 hours a day!
3. The us fails on mental health issues related to prevention. Jeez maybe its to do with health care for profit.
4. Something needs to change regarding our current gun laws, and soon.

Thats just my 2 cents feel free to tell me to go fuck myself.


Not likely. That's one of the most sane and reasonable opinions I've read online since this latest event.

Allen

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:39 am
by General Paranoia
Condottiero wrote:It's none of one's business what one posts, beyond what's in the message.


That's gibberish! Are you trying to tell us it's none of your business what you write?

Condottiero wrote: If I choose to list references and or cut and paste, who gives a fuck? If you don't agree with the message, then say so and back it up if called out, but don't whine about the style.


So basically you are allowed to do a quick cut and paste, but you expect other people to make an effort?


Condottiero wrote:What's this obsession over my sig? I don't go around obsessing over other posters sigs, so I'd expect the same courtesy.


Yes, what is this obsession over your sig? I've not mentioned it nor even bothered to look up it's meaning

When all all is said and done I have little interest in what you write, other than being vaguely amused by the inept way you present your ideas. If you choose to make a spectacle of yourself don't expect people not to take the piss.
If you think I come to Frothers to discuss politics you are mistaken, I come here for entertainment like most of the other posters.
You want to be taken seriously, go find a serious political forum :roll:

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:30 pm
by kawasaki v2.3
Condottiero wrote:
DemonEtrigan wrote:
Condottiero wrote:
kawasaki v2.3 wrote:Sorry I'm late, I've been busy.

I don't have anything to add, but can I call Condom a cunt? Because he's a cunt.

Based on what?


based on the fact that you are a cunt?....come on Condi, this is one of the clearest, fact based arguments in this entire thread. It's not hard to understand the underlying basis of it at all.

The underlying basis of it all is that there are plenty of ignorant cunts on this thread who are only interested in demeaning hyperbole about Americans. It might come as a shock to someone like you, but being called a baby killer isn't going to result in a polite response...


I didn't call you a baby killer, you baby killing cunt.

Oh.

Never mind.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:35 pm
by Il Segaiolo Pedantesco
Woodwose wrote:Guff...Guff...Guff...

I had meant something long-winded as usual, but you'll just end up being your vapid self and expect a rise from me... :P :P :P

So Happy Hogmanay and Lang may yer lum reek!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 5:09 pm
by General Paranoia
Condottiero wrote:
Woodwose wrote:Guff...Guff...Guff...

I had meant something long-winded as usual, but you'll just end up being your vapid self and expect a rise from me... :P :P :P

So Happy Hogmanay and Lang may yer lum reek!


See you on your next thread :wink:

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:43 pm
by TMeier
I was reading some of the comments on a very interesting link:

http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalr ... rates.html

And one struck me as being particularly gnomic, though not addressing all the complexities of the situation.

Veridical Driver June 2, 2011 at 1:17 pm

The real question, is the violent crime rate for non-marginalized U.S. citizens significantly different than other countries?

Sure, the U.K. has a low rate of homicides ? the negative effects of centuries of racism, imperialism, and slavery, have been externalized to Zimbabwe, South Africa, India, etc? In the U.S., because of its historically unique pattern of contiguous expansion (as opposed to acquiring far-flung overseas colonies), and of importing slaves (as opposed to enslaving people in said far-flung overseas colonies), the U.S. internalized the negative effects that Europeans where able to externalize via decolonization.

The murder rate for your average middle class person is extremely low. U.S. crime rates are concentrated in ultra-violent ?Ghettos?, composed of the victims and decedents of victims of slavery, segregation, and racism. What the United States has is essentially small violent third-world pockets that exist in an otherwise low-crime first-world country.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:12 pm
by aecurtis
I'm not sure I'd call Sumter, SC a "ghetto", but it surely is crime-ridden:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumter,_South_Carolina

It would be interesting to determine the ethnicity of the victims.

We do have our third-world pockets, but from my observation, they're mainly inhabited by those clinging to their Bibles and their guns, quivering in fear of some fantastical conspiratorial horror.

Allen