The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :froth: :loopy: :| :mrgreen: :demonic: 0:) 0;) :argue: :wry:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by A Yes Man » Fri Nov 27, 2020 8:04 pm

frotherPest wrote:Is anyone going to complain?
Is there a single moderator that would remove it?
Is the host site going to know?


No (to all three)

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by frotherPest » Fri Nov 27, 2020 7:56 pm

Is anyone going to complain?
Is there a single moderator that would remove it?
Is the host site going to know?

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Picador » Fri Nov 27, 2020 6:43 pm

Guest wrote:
Macunaima wrote:It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).

Courbet's L'origine du monde is a bona fide work of art (it's in the Musee d'Orsay), it still wouldn't last long on FB. It breaks the rule here too.


Hell, we are like dogs returning to eat our own vomit here - we discussed 'Origine du Monde' years ago, I remember it well.

Courbet's is a loverly work of art, I agree, but it's also quite definitely a cunt, and not allowed here. If Wargames Illustrated did a 'make your own Cunt' article, that wouldn't change that Mac. Plus, your 'tile of minges' isn't really in the same league anyway.


Mac didn't post anything about Courbet, that was me. So congratulations on remaking the point I was making.

Do try to keep up.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Guest » Fri Nov 27, 2020 6:34 pm

Macunaima wrote:It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).

Courbet's L'origine du monde is a bona fide work of art (it's in the Musee d'Orsay), it still wouldn't last long on FB. It breaks the rule here too.


Hell, we are like dogs returning to eat our own vomit here - we discussed 'Origine du Monde' years ago, I remember it well.

Courbet's is a loverly work of art, I agree, but it's also quite definitely a cunt, and not allowed here. If Wargames Illustrated did a 'make your own Cunt' article, that wouldn't change that Mac. Plus, your 'tile of minges' isn't really in the same league anyway.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Il Segaiolo Pedantesco » Fri Nov 27, 2020 6:07 pm

Picador wrote:
Macunaima wrote:
Picador wrote:
Macunaima wrote:Oh. While I can’t delete it now. Besides, this is a well known and celebrated work of art! It’s been on FB numerous times.


Facebook censors tits, so I think you might be telling porkies.


Nope. Definitely saw it on facebook. However, that was years ago and FB has gotten much more strict about its content control since then.

It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).


Courbet's L'origine du monde is a bona fide work of art (it's in the Musee d'Orsay), it still wouldn't last long on FB. It breaks the rule here too.

Mac knew not to post that pic, but he believes he's above the rules...

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Picador » Fri Nov 27, 2020 5:36 pm

Macunaima wrote:
Picador wrote:
Macunaima wrote:Oh. While I can’t delete it now. Besides, this is a well known and celebrated work of art! It’s been on FB numerous times.


Facebook censors tits, so I think you might be telling porkies.


Nope. Definitely saw it on facebook. However, that was years ago and FB has gotten much more strict about its content control since then.

It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).


Courbet's L'origine du monde is a bona fide work of art (it's in the Musee d'Orsay), it still wouldn't last long on FB. It breaks the rule here too.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Macunaima » Fri Nov 27, 2020 5:28 pm

Picador wrote:
Macunaima wrote:Oh. While I can’t delete it now. Besides, this is a well known and celebrated work of art! It’s been on FB numerous times.


Facebook censors tits, so I think you might be telling porkies.


Nope. Definitely saw it on facebook. However, that was years ago and FB has gotten much more strict about its content control since then.

It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Bronshtein » Fri Nov 27, 2020 1:49 pm

Well the artist may be one but this isn't a wall of them.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Picador » Fri Nov 27, 2020 1:33 pm

Macunaima wrote:Oh. While I can’t delete it now. Besides, this is a well known and celebrated work of art! It’s been on FB numerous times.


Facebook censors tits, so I think you might be telling porkies.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Macunaima » Fri Nov 27, 2020 1:19 pm

Oh. While I can’t delete it now. Besides, this is a well known and celebrated work of art! It’s been on FB numerous times.

Top