The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :froth: :loopy: :| :mrgreen: :demonic: 0:) 0;) :argue: :wry:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Ssanemax » Thu Jan 21, 2021 3:17 pm

Being a fellow Yank, I cracked the OFM’s code here.
Grover Dill is the sycophantic toady to the bully Scut Farkus in the Christmas classic movie, A Christmas Story. Kiley has toadies on TMP. No doubt about it.


PERHAPS Bill is as well educated as you are guest, but oddly enough John the OFM has just been Dawghoused for calling Kevin's friend that..........

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Guest » Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:11 pm

Bronshtein wrote:Oh dear!
John was shooting the wrong piano player this time :(

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP 19 Jan 2021 8:58 a.m. PST
Well, Kevin.
I feel apologies are in order here.
I was contacted by one of the principals in the "Really?" incident.
It was not you. It was your friend Grover Dill.
I'm man enough to admit I was wrong.

As Doc Holliday said in Tombstone, "There. Now we can be friends again."

Being a fellow Yank, I cracked the OFM’s code here.
Grover Dill is the sycophantic toady to the bully Scut Farkus in the Christmas classic movie, A Christmas Story. Kiley has toadies on TMP. No doubt about it.
For the Doc Holiday reference, here it is.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux6qPAWMaU4

I don’t think the OFM is friends with Kevin. As usual, he’s playing his own game. He insults Kiley twice, and he swallows it. Graciously of course.
This time he seems to have recruited like minded TMP dissidents.
He’ll get banned again, thinking he’s a hero.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Picador » Wed Jan 20, 2021 6:15 pm

It's a bit sneery, with a soupcon of 'our rules are the bestest'.

Image

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Guest » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:22 pm

Bronshtein wrote:Doesn't sound like sneering...


Oh, don't be a buzzkill. Get onboard with the agenda, won't ya!

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Ssanemax » Wed Jan 20, 2021 2:06 pm

Bronshtein wrote:Doesn't sound like sneering, sounds like a serious discussion about whether it is useful to add rules determining target selection or let people make their own mistakes.

He even thanks people for joining in and compliments everyone for not letting it sink into distractions.
Seems an almost perfect example of what a wargames forum should look like.

(obviously he ignored Martin Rapier who put forward a reasonable and valid counter argument, but you can't have everything. He wasn't going to change his mind but it did draw out some interesting thoughts about rule design. As long as everyone quits while they are ahead!)


I suspect the main issue is that anyone who has been involved in one of his discussions before now immediately reads his first post in the voice of an adenoidal 9 stone man with bottle bottom specs, who keeps pushing his glasses up his nose, sniffing, and twisting his face into an expression of contempt, so that even when you read "By the way thanks for all thos participating, this is a debate about game desigh that has no sunk into the all to familiar abstrsct discussions on simulation" it reads as 'Please will someone punch me savagely in the mouth?'

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Bronshtein » Wed Jan 20, 2021 12:06 pm

Doesn't sound like sneering, sounds like a serious discussion about whether it is useful to add rules determining target selection or let people make their own mistakes.

He even thanks people for joining in and compliments everyone for not letting it sink into distractions.
Seems an almost perfect example of what a wargames forum should look like.

(obviously he ignored Martin Rapier who put forward a reasonable and valid counter argument, but you can't have everything. He wasn't going to change his mind but it did draw out some interesting thoughts about rule design. As long as everyone quits while they are ahead!)

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Etranger2 » Wed Jan 20, 2021 3:52 am

Uscha up to his usual sneering take on other rules http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=544636

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Picador » Tue Jan 19, 2021 7:11 pm

On the pub car park

"I'm sorry I called you a cunt. It wasn't you, it was the other bloke with you I meant to call a cunt. Can we shake hands and be mates?"

Comes round surrounded by a crowd

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Bronshtein » Tue Jan 19, 2021 7:06 pm

Oh dear!
John was shooting the wrong piano player this time :(

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP 19 Jan 2021 8:58 a.m. PST
Well, Kevin.
I feel apologies are in order here.
I was contacted by one of the principals in the "Really?" incident.
It was not you. It was your friend Grover Dill.
I'm man enough to admit I was wrong.

As Doc Holliday said in Tombstone, "There. Now we can be friends again."

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Picador » Tue Jan 19, 2021 5:29 pm

The poor old cunt thinks he's doing something worthwhile. Who are you to deny him his raison d'etre Sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssanemax?

Top