Frothers Unite! UK
Quicklinks to Frothzones
Forum Index
FU!UK Main Page
FU!UK Shop
Site News
Frother Links
Log in
Register
Memberlist
Usergroups
FAQ
Search
Frothers Unite! UK Forum Index
->
Colonel Marbles' Miniatures Frothzone
Post a reply
Username
frotherGuest -->
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Font size
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Bodhi"]Personally I feel that the conservative tastes of a great portion of the customers - meaning that they will only buy things that are more or less a copy of a preexisting style - is a much bigger issue and problem than IP theft. IP theft is simply boring but boring tastes make some people feel forced to do these boring things. As is often the case in most parts of life - in my opinion - nostalgia is the great crook here. I'm trying to wage war against nostalgia on all fronts. Just my little mission in life :P :wink:[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Are you a Spambot?
Yes
No
(FU!UK honour system- if you are a genuine guest poster please select "No")
Confirmation code:
Enter the code exactly as you see it. The code is case sensitive and zero has a diagonal line through it.
New users and guest posters must enter a confirmation code to prevent spam and spoof messages. If you are visually impaired or cannot otherwise read this code please contact the
Administrator
for help.
All times are GMT
Jump to:
Select a forum
The Zones of Froth
----------------
Colonel Marbles' Miniatures Frothzone
Painters Unite! UK Forum
Wargames Misc.
Fantasy Warriors Zone
Role-Players Inn
CCG Surgery
Boardgamers' Galley
Virtual Frother
Your Frother Community
----------------
Clubs and Communities
Play With Me!
Frothtown Marketplace
General Frothing & Tangency
----------------
The Froth Pot
Frother Feedback Box
Frother Fun & Cultural Awareness
----------------
Movie Zone
Comics Emporium
Frother Book Club
Development Forums
----------------
Salute 2010 WWI Football
Frothbowl 2009 Organisers
Salute 2010 Frotherheim
Cthluedo 2011
Battlefield 2011
Topic review
Author
Message
Duff
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:46 am Post subject:
Snowcat wrote:
Quote:
Just keeping it within the realms of fantasy, read any page from any book by Wolfe, Peake, Holdstock or Robert Harrison and compare it to anything from LotR. The difference in quality is staggering.
Having read most of Wolfe's Book Of The New Sun series, and Peake's Gormenghast, I have this to say: the difference in *tedium* at least is not staggering.
Not sure I agree but I see your point.
Snowcat wrote:
Quote:
Soldier in the Mist by Gene Wolfe
That's the one where the main character has no memory from one day to the next isn't it?
Yep, plus the follow up Soldier of Atrete. Wolfe is releasing the 3rd Latro novel later this year apprently.
Roy
Patules
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:09 am Post subject:
Quote:
And did I mention Wagner with respect to size of the works? No, I didn't. And the size of an opera is mentioned in pages? (The libretto's aren't that big)
No, you certainly didn't. And neither did I.
Quote:
Want a short fantasy work with depth?
Lord of Light by Zelazny? Soldier in the Mist by Gene Wolfe? Both very innovative, and well written.
I don't doubt that.
Snowcat
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:22 am Post subject:
Quote:
Soldier in the Mist by Gene Wolfe
That's the one where the main character has no memory from one day to the next isn't it?
Motorway
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:11 am Post subject:
Patules wrote:
Quote:
Sure: Jack Vance's fantasy and SF universes, Zelazny's Fantasy universes, and what about Clark Ashton Smith's Zothique indeed? Beats JRR in many ways.
What about Zothique indeed! Mmmm, for some reason, you felt the need to erase "CAS's various cycles" out of my quote.
Quote:
Is the size of a tedious work of a kid's fairy tale a sign of depth?
No. 'Rings is what, a little over a thousand pages? Great attempt at putting up a convincing argument though. And that emoticon just adds that extra sting to it~!
Quote:
Just keeping it within the realms of fantasy, read any page from any book by Wolfe, Peake, Holdstock or Robert Harrison and compare it to anything from LotR. The difference in quality is staggering.
0K.
In my initial spontaneous reaction I failed to see you already mentioned CAS, I tried to edit it my reaction but the board didn't swallow that. Happy now?
And did I mention Wagner with respect to size of the works? No, I didn't. And the size of an opera is mentioned in
pages
? (The libretto's aren't that big)
Want a short fantasy work with depth?
Lord of Light by Zelazny? Soldier in the Mist by Gene Wolfe? Both very innovative, and well written.
area23
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:00 am Post subject:
Marquis wrote:
I just think it was funny to cite the Socialist Review on ANYTHING, let alone literary value.
Indeed. And in fact, when you google 'Tolkien' and 'socialist' you'll find they rehash the same arguments every ten years or so. I believe they had a similar review published in the sixties.
Still some of the boy named China's arguments are quite valid.
Moorcock's text is a bit pretentious, comparing Starship Troopers with Mein Kampf is a bit exaggerated.
But all rather entertaining. It must have been written in the early eighties.
But I like Moorcock.
Snowcat
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:45 am Post subject:
Quote:
Just keeping it within the realms of fantasy, read any page from any book by Wolfe, Peake, Holdstock or Robert Harrison and compare it to anything from LotR. The difference in quality is staggering.
Having read most of Wolfe's Book Of The New Sun series, and Peake's Gormenghast, I have this to say: the difference in *tedium* at least is not staggering.
Patules
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:25 pm Post subject:
Quote:
Sure: Jack Vance's fantasy and SF universes, Zelazny's Fantasy universes, and what about Clark Ashton Smith's Zothique indeed? Beats JRR in many ways.
What about Zothique indeed! Mmmm, for some reason, you felt the need to erase "CAS's various cycles" out of my quote.
Quote:
Is the size of a tedious work of a kid's fairy tale a sign of depth?
No. 'Rings is what, a little over a thousand pages? Great attempt at putting up a convincing argument though. And that emoticon just adds that extra sting to it~!
Quote:
Just keeping it within the realms of fantasy, read any page from any book by Wolfe, Peake, Holdstock or Robert Harrison and compare it to anything from LotR. The difference in quality is staggering.
0K.
Duff
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:35 pm Post subject:
Patules wrote:
Ugh. "Tolkein" created his worlds, mythology and history with words. If his writing is such piss-poor drivel, how can the worlds, mythology and history he created with this writing still be considered great?
Does a statement this fucking stupid even need an answer? May as well. The ability to envisage a fantasy world, populate it and give it a history does not mean you are a literary genius, just that you have the ability to write. To create prose of depth, that says something about the human condition, that is a joy to read just for the sake of reading it, that is what makes literary genius. Something Tolkein was totally incapable of doing.
Just keeping it within the realms of fantasy, read any page from any book by Wolfe, Peake, Holdstock or Robert Harrison and compare it to anything from LotR. The difference in quality is staggering.
JRR wrote:
At least I knew how to spell "idyll".
Roy
Jakar Nilson
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 2:11 pm Post subject:
I take it most people have not actually read books where the protagonist just sits for the entirety of the work? Take Roch Carrier's "Il n'y a pas de pays sans grand-père", which I read in High School. I figured since he had written "the Hockey Sweater" that it must be good. It wasn't. It's about a senile old man who stays in a rocking chair on a porch thinking about the same four things throughout the book (including his idiotic seperatist grandson), and finaly goes psycho on a bus driver at the end. Utter tripe.
Tolkien flows compared to that. The biggest stumbling block is book I of LoTR. Once you're out of the Shire, everything is in high gear.
Ernest Errol Quinch
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:34 pm Post subject:
The Hobbit is a great book but the LOTR is utter shite. One of 3 books I have prefered to throw at a wall rather than continue reading.
Lotr is long winded actionless pap of the highest order. He could of cut several hundred pages out and had a good read insted of the tower of wankfest he ended up with.
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group